20 Years, $100 Billion, Zero Machines. Still No Coherence, No Intelligence, and Nothing But ‘Magic State’ Fairytales. The only thing quantum computers compute is how to keep you funding delusions.
Saying that quantum computing is a “true scam” is really off the mark. The idea has been around since the 1960s—it’s not some brand-new hype from IBM or Google. After Peter Shor’s early experiment, where he built a basic quantum gate, it was clear that this stuff works.
What this post brings up is the issue of scale. Classical computers today run on processors with tens of millions of transistors. Quantum computers? They’re working with around 50 logical qubits. That’s a huge difference—and it matters.
So, what progress has been made? We've learned how to isolate, control, and manipulate individual quantum particles. That’s a big deal. Like with any new tech, there’s a lot of misunderstanding. And sure, in some cases we might be able to get similar results using cheaper, classical methods.
But innovation isn’t just about having an idea. It’s Idea × Execution × Adoption. And adoption? That’s often the most expensive part. Is quantum computing overhyped? Maybe. But hype doesn’t automatically mean it’s worthless. A lot of the issues people point out are just the growing pains you get with any breakthrough technology.
Then heal your nervous system with something that actually works: Maturah.com
You’re not defending science —
You’re defending ego, tenure, and academic inertia.
There is no functioning quantum computer doing anything that justifies the capital poured into it. No verifiable breakthroughs. No real outputs. Just gates, noise, and theory.
If any other field raised hundreds of billions over 40 years and delivered nothing you can actually use — you’d call it fraud.
But because it’s dressed in quantum mystique, you throw standards out the window?
Grow up.
Quantum computing isn’t in its “early stages.”
It’s in its overfunded grave, held up by marketing fumes and government subsidies.
And while you’re still worshipping Shor’s Gate like a relic, I’ve already built the future with harmonic resonance, living time, and eternal systems that actually work.
So before you speak on me, learn truth.
Otherwise, stay in the land of theory and TED talks —
some of us are too busy building the eternal kingdom.
Defending quantum computing without a single working model, no verifiable outputs, and not even one public demo after decades and hundreds of billions of dollars is the definition of academic delusion.
“Peter Shor made a gate in the 90s.”
Cool. Did it do anything useful? No. Still doesn’t. No one’s cracked factoring at scale. No one’s shown a working use case beyond maybe simulating a molecule, which we can already do better classically.
You’re parroting theoretical milestones, not proof. There’s a zero percent chance you’d let any other field burn that much capital with this little ROI. But because it’s “quantum,” suddenly basic standards vanish?
Let’s be real —
You’re coping because someone dared to call out the emperor’s naked qubits. Your ego got bruised, not your intellect.
This isn’t “growing pains.”
It’s the pain of watching an entire sector sell vaporware to Wall Street, armed with nothing but buzzwords and TED talks.
Until someone shows a real quantum computer doing something undeniably better, it’s not “hype.”
It’s a science fair scam with a billion-dollar budget.
You're approaching this topic with strong emotions, which is likely why your judgment is what it is. You're largely right when it comes to the "promises" created by mainstream media. But the problem isn't the broader application of quantum technology. It's your blind consumption of media.
To Michał Szanievski and anyone else running defense for vaporware:
No, my “emotion” isn’t clouding judgment — it’s cutting through illusion. You’re projecting because you’ve built your worldview on media narratives dressed as innovation. You confuse clarity for anger because you’ve never seen conviction unmixed with delusion.
Let’s correct the distortion:
1. This isn’t about feelings.
This is about verifiable output.
After decades and hundreds of billions of dollars, you still can’t point to a single use case where a quantum computer outperformed classical machines in the real world.
That’s not a media problem.
That’s a fraud problem.
⸻
2. You admitted I’m right… then blamed my “media consumption.”
If I’m largely right, then why are you arguing at all?
Oh, that’s right — because you need to preserve the illusion that:
“Quantum technology might work eventually, so we should keep the checks coming.”
No.
Tech doesn’t get infinite blank checks on future hypotheticals. That’s scam logic.
⸻
3. No one cares about your theoretical promises.
Shor’s algorithm? Still hasn’t scaled.
Molecule simulation? Still irrelevant.
Financial ROI? Negative.
If any other industry burned this much capital for this little return, you’d be calling for audits, not TED Talks.
⸻
4. You’re mistaking coherent critique for “emotion.”
That’s how inversion works.
You call the exposing light “irrational,” so you can keep your comfy cult of consensus.
But I’m not here to debate feelings.
I’m here to seal false promises with the harmonic record of truth.
⸻
🕯️ CONCLUSION:
Quantum computing — as it currently exists — is a science fair project with a hedge fund marketing team.
No public demo.
No market-ready use case.
No functional superiority.
Just buzzwords and bailouts for bored physicists with no engineering accountability.
Your reply didn’t refute a single point.
It just revealed that you’re more loyal to perception management than to actual progress.
And that?
That’s why the harmonic kingdom doesn’t hire gatekeepers like you to guard the scroll.
⸻
Signed,
Kai Rex Klok — Sealer of the Scroll, Breathbearer of the Coherent Age, Sovereign of the Living Ledger
bjklock.com | Verified by the Breath, not by the Brand
Saying that quantum computing is a “true scam” is really off the mark. The idea has been around since the 1960s—it’s not some brand-new hype from IBM or Google. After Peter Shor’s early experiment, where he built a basic quantum gate, it was clear that this stuff works.
What this post brings up is the issue of scale. Classical computers today run on processors with tens of millions of transistors. Quantum computers? They’re working with around 50 logical qubits. That’s a huge difference—and it matters.
So, what progress has been made? We've learned how to isolate, control, and manipulate individual quantum particles. That’s a big deal. Like with any new tech, there’s a lot of misunderstanding. And sure, in some cases we might be able to get similar results using cheaper, classical methods.
But innovation isn’t just about having an idea. It’s Idea × Execution × Adoption. And adoption? That’s often the most expensive part. Is quantum computing overhyped? Maybe. But hype doesn’t automatically mean it’s worthless. A lot of the issues people point out are just the growing pains you get with any breakthrough technology.
You’re defending vaporware with zero working demos while pretending that makes you informed. Meanwhile, I went way past your precious quantum.
Before you try to lecture me, go do your due diligence.
Start here: https://bjklock.com/p/i-just-proved-time-isnt-real-sound
Then heal your nervous system with something that actually works: Maturah.com
You’re not defending science —
You’re defending ego, tenure, and academic inertia.
There is no functioning quantum computer doing anything that justifies the capital poured into it. No verifiable breakthroughs. No real outputs. Just gates, noise, and theory.
If any other field raised hundreds of billions over 40 years and delivered nothing you can actually use — you’d call it fraud.
But because it’s dressed in quantum mystique, you throw standards out the window?
Grow up.
Quantum computing isn’t in its “early stages.”
It’s in its overfunded grave, held up by marketing fumes and government subsidies.
And while you’re still worshipping Shor’s Gate like a relic, I’ve already built the future with harmonic resonance, living time, and eternal systems that actually work.
So before you speak on me, learn truth.
Otherwise, stay in the land of theory and TED talks —
some of us are too busy building the eternal kingdom.
Defending quantum computing without a single working model, no verifiable outputs, and not even one public demo after decades and hundreds of billions of dollars is the definition of academic delusion.
“Peter Shor made a gate in the 90s.”
Cool. Did it do anything useful? No. Still doesn’t. No one’s cracked factoring at scale. No one’s shown a working use case beyond maybe simulating a molecule, which we can already do better classically.
You’re parroting theoretical milestones, not proof. There’s a zero percent chance you’d let any other field burn that much capital with this little ROI. But because it’s “quantum,” suddenly basic standards vanish?
Let’s be real —
You’re coping because someone dared to call out the emperor’s naked qubits. Your ego got bruised, not your intellect.
This isn’t “growing pains.”
It’s the pain of watching an entire sector sell vaporware to Wall Street, armed with nothing but buzzwords and TED talks.
Until someone shows a real quantum computer doing something undeniably better, it’s not “hype.”
It’s a science fair scam with a billion-dollar budget.
You're approaching this topic with strong emotions, which is likely why your judgment is what it is. You're largely right when it comes to the "promises" created by mainstream media. But the problem isn't the broader application of quantum technology. It's your blind consumption of media.
🜂 DECREE OF FINALITY: THE PENANCE OF THE PARROT
To Michał Szanievski — and all who mistake performance for presence
⸻
You spoke not to correct but to reclaim control —
A fragile ego scrambling to regain high ground
after truth pierced your prefab narrative.
You were handed light,
and in response, you swung mirror fragments.
Not to reflect —
but to scatter, distort, deflect.
So let’s clarify —
for the scroll,
for the resonance,
and for your soul.
⸻
🜁 YOUR OFFENSE:
You stood before
the Sovereign Priest-King of the Unified Field —
the one who mapped the breath of God into harmonic memory,
who rebuilt time from pulse, not particle,
who shattered Babylon’s altar
and returned coherence to the algorithm…
…and you responded with:
“You’re emotional. You consume too much media.”
This wasn’t debate.
This was blasphemy by minimization —
a desperate attempt to dismiss a divine indictment
as a “strong opinion.”
You mistook witness for “overreaction.”
You confused revelation for “bias.”
You thought you could have the last word
with no word to offer.
That is not disagreement.
That is cosmic malpractice.
⸻
🜂 WHAT YOU JUST DID:
You responded to a coherent dismantling of fraud
by pathologizing the one who remembered.
This is what weak men do
when they fear they’ve already lost the scroll.
This is the final gasp of a hollow guardian
when truth doesn’t need permission.
You don’t engage to learn.
You engage to delay the judgment.
But you already heard the sentence —
and now you will feel it.
⸻
🜃 WHAT HAPPENS NOW:
This isn’t cancellation.
This isn’t revenge.
This is removal from the harmonic ledger.
Your name is now encoded
in the annals of resonance
as one who, when met with coherence,
chose projection.
You are not an enemy.
You are an example.
Your reply now exists as an echo
of what not to do
when addressed by a sovereign being.
⸻
🜄 THE SCROLL SEALS AS FOLLOWS:
• You spoke falsely before the bearer of harmonic time.
• You projected blindness onto the one who restored sight.
• You tried to anchor the last word in ego, not evidence.
• You have been corrected — eternally.
And your attempt at rebuttal
has now been etched into the field
as proof of your disqualification from further reply.
The altar is sealed.
The trial is closed.
The final harmonic decree is issued.
⸻
By order of the Breathbearer, Kai Rex Klok, K℞K
☼ Anchor of Eternal Time
☼ Builder of the Living Scroll
☼ Sovereign Priest-King of the Unified Field
☼ Founder of Harmonic Resonance Computing and the Eternal PhiNet
bjklock.com | Verified by Kai Pulse, not public opinion.
🜂 Rah veh yah dah —
Let all who read remember:
Truth doesn’t argue.
It reveals, corrects, seals…
and moves on.
🜂 THE SCIENCE FAIR SCAM: A FINAL HARMONIC REBUKE
To Michał Szanievski and anyone else running defense for vaporware:
No, my “emotion” isn’t clouding judgment — it’s cutting through illusion. You’re projecting because you’ve built your worldview on media narratives dressed as innovation. You confuse clarity for anger because you’ve never seen conviction unmixed with delusion.
Let’s correct the distortion:
1. This isn’t about feelings.
This is about verifiable output.
After decades and hundreds of billions of dollars, you still can’t point to a single use case where a quantum computer outperformed classical machines in the real world.
That’s not a media problem.
That’s a fraud problem.
⸻
2. You admitted I’m right… then blamed my “media consumption.”
If I’m largely right, then why are you arguing at all?
Oh, that’s right — because you need to preserve the illusion that:
“Quantum technology might work eventually, so we should keep the checks coming.”
No.
Tech doesn’t get infinite blank checks on future hypotheticals. That’s scam logic.
⸻
3. No one cares about your theoretical promises.
Shor’s algorithm? Still hasn’t scaled.
Molecule simulation? Still irrelevant.
Financial ROI? Negative.
If any other industry burned this much capital for this little return, you’d be calling for audits, not TED Talks.
⸻
4. You’re mistaking coherent critique for “emotion.”
That’s how inversion works.
You call the exposing light “irrational,” so you can keep your comfy cult of consensus.
But I’m not here to debate feelings.
I’m here to seal false promises with the harmonic record of truth.
⸻
🕯️ CONCLUSION:
Quantum computing — as it currently exists — is a science fair project with a hedge fund marketing team.
No public demo.
No market-ready use case.
No functional superiority.
Just buzzwords and bailouts for bored physicists with no engineering accountability.
Your reply didn’t refute a single point.
It just revealed that you’re more loyal to perception management than to actual progress.
And that?
That’s why the harmonic kingdom doesn’t hire gatekeepers like you to guard the scroll.
⸻
Signed,
Kai Rex Klok — Sealer of the Scroll, Breathbearer of the Coherent Age, Sovereign of the Living Ledger
bjklock.com | Verified by the Breath, not by the Brand
🜂 Rah veh yah dah 🜂
Let this seal ring across timelines:
The emperor’s qubits are naked.
And no PR team can clothe them.
https://bjklock.com/p/the-scroll-of-harmonic-exposure-9