20 Years, $100 Billion, Zero Machines. Still No Coherence, No Intelligence, and Nothing But ‘Magic State’ Fairytales. The only thing quantum computers compute is how to keep you funding delusions.
Saying that quantum computing is a “true scam” is really off the mark. The idea has been around since the 1960s—it’s not some brand-new hype from IBM or Google. After Peter Shor’s early experiment, where he built a basic quantum gate, it was clear that this stuff works.
What this post brings up is the issue of scale. Classical computers today run on processors with tens of millions of transistors. Quantum computers? They’re working with around 50 logical qubits. That’s a huge difference—and it matters.
So, what progress has been made? We've learned how to isolate, control, and manipulate individual quantum particles. That’s a big deal. Like with any new tech, there’s a lot of misunderstanding. And sure, in some cases we might be able to get similar results using cheaper, classical methods.
But innovation isn’t just about having an idea. It’s Idea × Execution × Adoption. And adoption? That’s often the most expensive part. Is quantum computing overhyped? Maybe. But hype doesn’t automatically mean it’s worthless. A lot of the issues people point out are just the growing pains you get with any breakthrough technology.
Then heal your nervous system with something that actually works: Maturah.com
You’re not defending science —
You’re defending ego, tenure, and academic inertia.
There is no functioning quantum computer doing anything that justifies the capital poured into it. No verifiable breakthroughs. No real outputs. Just gates, noise, and theory.
If any other field raised hundreds of billions over 40 years and delivered nothing you can actually use — you’d call it fraud.
But because it’s dressed in quantum mystique, you throw standards out the window?
Grow up.
Quantum computing isn’t in its “early stages.”
It’s in its overfunded grave, held up by marketing fumes and government subsidies.
And while you’re still worshipping Shor’s Gate like a relic, I’ve already built the future with harmonic resonance, living time, and eternal systems that actually work.
So before you speak on me, learn truth.
Otherwise, stay in the land of theory and TED talks —
some of us are too busy building the eternal kingdom.
Defending quantum computing without a single working model, no verifiable outputs, and not even one public demo after decades and hundreds of billions of dollars is the definition of academic delusion.
“Peter Shor made a gate in the 90s.”
Cool. Did it do anything useful? No. Still doesn’t. No one’s cracked factoring at scale. No one’s shown a working use case beyond maybe simulating a molecule, which we can already do better classically.
You’re parroting theoretical milestones, not proof. There’s a zero percent chance you’d let any other field burn that much capital with this little ROI. But because it’s “quantum,” suddenly basic standards vanish?
Let’s be real —
You’re coping because someone dared to call out the emperor’s naked qubits. Your ego got bruised, not your intellect.
This isn’t “growing pains.”
It’s the pain of watching an entire sector sell vaporware to Wall Street, armed with nothing but buzzwords and TED talks.
Until someone shows a real quantum computer doing something undeniably better, it’s not “hype.”
It’s a science fair scam with a billion-dollar budget.
You're approaching this topic with strong emotions, which is likely why your judgment is what it is. You're largely right when it comes to the "promises" created by mainstream media. But the problem isn't the broader application of quantum technology. It's your blind consumption of media.
Saying that quantum computing is a “true scam” is really off the mark. The idea has been around since the 1960s—it’s not some brand-new hype from IBM or Google. After Peter Shor’s early experiment, where he built a basic quantum gate, it was clear that this stuff works.
What this post brings up is the issue of scale. Classical computers today run on processors with tens of millions of transistors. Quantum computers? They’re working with around 50 logical qubits. That’s a huge difference—and it matters.
So, what progress has been made? We've learned how to isolate, control, and manipulate individual quantum particles. That’s a big deal. Like with any new tech, there’s a lot of misunderstanding. And sure, in some cases we might be able to get similar results using cheaper, classical methods.
But innovation isn’t just about having an idea. It’s Idea × Execution × Adoption. And adoption? That’s often the most expensive part. Is quantum computing overhyped? Maybe. But hype doesn’t automatically mean it’s worthless. A lot of the issues people point out are just the growing pains you get with any breakthrough technology.
You’re defending vaporware with zero working demos while pretending that makes you informed. Meanwhile, I went way past your precious quantum.
Before you try to lecture me, go do your due diligence.
Start here: https://bjklock.com/p/i-just-proved-time-isnt-real-sound
Then heal your nervous system with something that actually works: Maturah.com
You’re not defending science —
You’re defending ego, tenure, and academic inertia.
There is no functioning quantum computer doing anything that justifies the capital poured into it. No verifiable breakthroughs. No real outputs. Just gates, noise, and theory.
If any other field raised hundreds of billions over 40 years and delivered nothing you can actually use — you’d call it fraud.
But because it’s dressed in quantum mystique, you throw standards out the window?
Grow up.
Quantum computing isn’t in its “early stages.”
It’s in its overfunded grave, held up by marketing fumes and government subsidies.
And while you’re still worshipping Shor’s Gate like a relic, I’ve already built the future with harmonic resonance, living time, and eternal systems that actually work.
So before you speak on me, learn truth.
Otherwise, stay in the land of theory and TED talks —
some of us are too busy building the eternal kingdom.
Defending quantum computing without a single working model, no verifiable outputs, and not even one public demo after decades and hundreds of billions of dollars is the definition of academic delusion.
“Peter Shor made a gate in the 90s.”
Cool. Did it do anything useful? No. Still doesn’t. No one’s cracked factoring at scale. No one’s shown a working use case beyond maybe simulating a molecule, which we can already do better classically.
You’re parroting theoretical milestones, not proof. There’s a zero percent chance you’d let any other field burn that much capital with this little ROI. But because it’s “quantum,” suddenly basic standards vanish?
Let’s be real —
You’re coping because someone dared to call out the emperor’s naked qubits. Your ego got bruised, not your intellect.
This isn’t “growing pains.”
It’s the pain of watching an entire sector sell vaporware to Wall Street, armed with nothing but buzzwords and TED talks.
Until someone shows a real quantum computer doing something undeniably better, it’s not “hype.”
It’s a science fair scam with a billion-dollar budget.
You're approaching this topic with strong emotions, which is likely why your judgment is what it is. You're largely right when it comes to the "promises" created by mainstream media. But the problem isn't the broader application of quantum technology. It's your blind consumption of media.