Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michał Szaniewski's avatar

Saying that quantum computing is a “true scam” is really off the mark. The idea has been around since the 1960s—it’s not some brand-new hype from IBM or Google. After Peter Shor’s early experiment, where he built a basic quantum gate, it was clear that this stuff works.

What this post brings up is the issue of scale. Classical computers today run on processors with tens of millions of transistors. Quantum computers? They’re working with around 50 logical qubits. That’s a huge difference—and it matters.

So, what progress has been made? We've learned how to isolate, control, and manipulate individual quantum particles. That’s a big deal. Like with any new tech, there’s a lot of misunderstanding. And sure, in some cases we might be able to get similar results using cheaper, classical methods.

But innovation isn’t just about having an idea. It’s Idea × Execution × Adoption. And adoption? That’s often the most expensive part. Is quantum computing overhyped? Maybe. But hype doesn’t automatically mean it’s worthless. A lot of the issues people point out are just the growing pains you get with any breakthrough technology.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts